Elections Municipales a Maurice par GDL
The recent council elections in Mauritius saw the opposition winning three out of the five councils.
In can be said, three and a half because in Curepipe, the opposition did not win nor did loose. Each of the major blocks won seven seats each. One independent from the MMSD will decide who will administer the town for the next five years.
It was a lost for the government as they have been too long in control of the towns. Instead of having the elections after the five-year term, they stayed in power for another two years. This postponement of the elections was purely a tactic from the central government allowing the councillors to stay in their positions and enjoyed. Unfortunately, they did not use these additional two years towards a more responsible approach but kept indulging in inner bickering, routs and corrupt behaviours.
It looks as if the sound and effective administration of the towns and the welfare of the city dwellers was not their priority.
The leader of the Government and the ruling coalition realising that their councillors have not been up to scratch, put a new team to face the elections. The Prime Minster, Navin Ramgoolam, invested in the campaigns and even danced the sega in the streets to attract media attention. He also got mad when the national television did not show him campaigning at Cite Atlee in Curepipe.
According to an article by Anil Gayan which appeared in L'Express on 11th December 2012, Navin Ramgoolam played the division game during the campaign. He has a type of rhetoric to the Muslims of Plaine Verte and used another language to the Hindus of Palma and La Source. According to the author, this was an attempt at balkanising Mauritius and dividing the electorate on community grounds. Anil Gayan expressed his disgust at such a tactic by the Prime Minister of the country. Many times Navin forget that he is a statesperson and feel more comfortable in the politician role. This is not only a weakness on his part but a shortcoming. He lacks the stature of a PM.
However, this is no strange or new; Navin Ramgoolam won the past elections while playing on the emotions of the Hindus in rural areas telling them not to vote Paul Berenger as he is not an Hindu. This strategy of divide and rule has up to now worked in his favour. But not this time it seems.
This time he tried to sow division between the Muslims and the Hindus and targeted Aneerood Jughnuth as the enemy of Muslims. He vehemently attacked SAJ seein him as a direct competitor, more so because the Jughnuths are of the same cast as him, Vaish. The results in Sodnac in Quatre Bornes show that there is a change of voting patters of the Hindus. They do not overwhelmingly support Navin Ramgoolam and his corrupt government.
While the victory was overwhelming in Beau Bassin/ Rose Hill, the results were tighter in Port Louis and Quatre Bornes but a win is a win. It was a psychological boost for the opposition which will give hope to their supporters that the next general elections are winnable.
No matter what happened in Curepipe, the facts are, the government has lost control over the town councils and apparently even in the village councils. The voters sanctioned the government councillors for their lack of dignity, for their abuse of power, the maladministration of the towns and their manze, bwar, amuse, voyager attitudes.
The writings are on the walls for the government alliance. Having all the ministers on the campaign trail,( some even to the extent of bribing the electorate with macaroni packets), was toxic for the government as they are all perceived to be corrupt and incompetent. They repulse the people more than they attract them. There was also the broyani affair which the people of Quatres Bornes were waiting to sanction Nita Deerplasing, the campaign manager in the town.
The Remake 2000, through these results received the blessing of the people of the towns ( and also of the villages ). But the tandem SAJ and PB need to work harder and not take for granted that the wave is bulding up and the tsunami will strike in 2015.
This is my space, my opinion and my views. I do not belong to any political parties and do not support any of them, be it in Australia or overseas. I am a journalist trying to be critical and objective and call a spade a spade. No political correctnes. Please contribute to the debate but Please keep comments civil. There are these things called libel laws.
Radio Kontak sur le net
George at Studio 2GLF 89.3 fm
Broadcasting Emission Kontak
Thursday, 13 December 2012
Sunday, 9 December 2012
George's Blog: The lucky country by GDL
George's Blog: The lucky country by GDL: In Australia, we do ot seem to be afraid of uncertainty and not scared of what tomorrow will be. We take forgranted that live in the world...
The lucky country by GDL
In Australia, we do ot seem to be afraid of uncertainty and not scared of what tomorrow will be. We take forgranted that we live in the land of plenty, in the lucky country and that we are allright. How many times have we not heard, said to someone in trouble, " You'll be allright mate".
In Australia, we have seen boom and bust, we have seen recession and growth, we have seen changes from left wing to right wing governments, we have seen natural catastrophes like flood, fire, cyclones, even earthquakes, but we are still going.
Australia is in fact the lucky country. Many migrants who were living in abject poverty, living on the edge and starving in their thirdworld contries, or again in refugee camps where tomorrow culd not even be compemplated, have come to this country and now living like a decent human being.
Some have come from wartorn countries to find peace and harmony in Australia, and sleeping tight at night. Others have fled persecutions and discrimnation to find their self-esteem restored here.
Others without any qualifications whatsoever, or could not even say a word of english, have found their way in life here. Not only they are living very comfrotably, but have had children who are today graduades and professionals.
Australia is a first world country by living standard and its high GDP per capita. The country has a rich deposit of mineral resources, has vast arabe land and pastures, and the fundamentals of its economy are strong. We have 10 percent of the very rich, a very big middle class and a very small percentage of proletariat. Poverty is a relative term in Australia. Someone will find that he is poor only by comparison. A relatively poor person in Australia, will always be able to cut his/her clothes according to the cloth. There is always a shop where a poor person can find what he/she needs, and/or find ways to have a roof over his/her head.
Australia is a generous welfare state, with an effective social security system including dole for the unemployed, invalidity benefits, new start allowance, Austudy for the students, and a means-tested old aged pension, just to name a few.
Like most of the developed world and economies, Australia has its social problems. The level of mental health is very high, 285 people are diagnosed with diabetes everyday, there is a high rate of death from cancer and alcohol related diseases. The unemployment rate, if it is only around five percent, means that close to 400,000 people are living on the dole and not able to envisage a clear future. The youth suicide is high and drugs is on the rise among the youth.
There is a proliferation of nursing home because of our ageing population, and that the baby boomers have now reached retirement age. Many children found it easier to send their old ones in nursing homes rather than to care for them, even if it amounts to paying back their respect and dues to their fathers and mothers.
With affluence come individualism and Australians and even migrants, are going down that path. In Australia most people do not know the name of their neighbour and rarely hear a cry for help and step out of your comfort zone and lend a hand, not even find the time to do it. The call is most of the time simply ignored.
This is what characterises our society, the modern and post modern society: individualism, indifference, consumerism, competition, greed, money, money and money.... And the individual will only find this out the day he/she faces the hard reality. But then its is already too late, after the nursing home is the grave, and then forgotten for ever..
GDL.
Tuesday, 27 November 2012
cultural ghetto
Assimilation, multiculturalism or cultural ghettos by GDL
The case of a Mauritian artist revisiting Australia has sparked passionate debate among the Mauritian community in Australia. The debate was even echoed by the Mauritian media.
It all started when a local artist, Mr Lindsay Xavier expressed surprise to see the Mauritian sega singer back in Australia after his pitiful performance the year before.
According to Mr Xavier, last time the artist in question, arrived on stage two and a half hours late and only performed for forty minutes all while repeating the same songs.
Mr Xavier made the point on Emission Kontak that the those who were at the concert were disappointed with his performance as felt that they were taken for a drive. " All I am asking is quality. An artist should always give the best of himself in front of a paid assistance. It is not asking too much from a professional. " he said.
Following on from what he witnessed last time, Mr Xavier explained that he will surely not attend the next show. Mr Xavier was backed by the Secretary of the Mauritian Community Welfare Association of Sydney and a radio broadcaster, Mr Lamvohee, who advocated that these shows are not doing any good to the community and that some of the artists here can do a better job. The concert went ahead and it was not surprising that the turnout was meagre. However, despite the low attendance the artist made a better performance than last year. It was obvious that a lesson seems to have been learnt there.
Unfortunately, some in the same Mauritian community attacked vehemently Mr Xavier, and Mr Lamvohee, to the extent of personal attacks and libel. Their attacks were based on the grounds that both Mr Xavier and Mr Lamvohee are downgrading Mauritian artists and the Mauritian sega.
On Emission Kontak, Mr Xavier brushed aside these accusations as false and malicious, that it was clear that some have not understood, or deliberately deformed and misconstrued the facts, preferring to attack the messenger rather than the message.
The debate was amplified by a member of the community from Melbourne who went as far as accusing the Mauritians of Sydney of not being true blue Mauritians and lowering their self-esteem. All this because they did not attend the sega show in Sydney (!!!) while there was 500 or more Mauritians attending the concert n Melbourne. It was a clear strategy of reigniting the old rivalry of Sydney v/s Melbourne.
The lesson to be drawn from this episode is that the Mauritians of Sydney look more opened and have not closed themselves in their Mauritian cultural ghetto. It is true and clear that Mauritians of Sydney do not flock together as much as those of Melbourne.
Sydney is a bigger metropolis and a more sophisticated city. Such a situation seems to have taken its toll on the Sydney inhabitants in general, not only on Mauritians. In Sydney there are more things happening, there is a wider choice of leisure and entertainment. It is therefore normal for people to be exposed to a different lifestyle and influenced by the prevailing atmosphere.
This episode also denotes that Mauritians of Melbourne are more linked with their motherland and more embedded in their culture to the extent of always being together at sports and cultural events. While it is not a bad thing it itself, whereas those of Sydney are more likely to think and decide where to go and have a good time.
GDL.
The case of a Mauritian artist revisiting Australia has sparked passionate debate among the Mauritian community in Australia. The debate was even echoed by the Mauritian media.
It all started when a local artist, Mr Lindsay Xavier expressed surprise to see the Mauritian sega singer back in Australia after his pitiful performance the year before.
According to Mr Xavier, last time the artist in question, arrived on stage two and a half hours late and only performed for forty minutes all while repeating the same songs.
Mr Xavier made the point on Emission Kontak that the those who were at the concert were disappointed with his performance as felt that they were taken for a drive. " All I am asking is quality. An artist should always give the best of himself in front of a paid assistance. It is not asking too much from a professional. " he said.
Following on from what he witnessed last time, Mr Xavier explained that he will surely not attend the next show. Mr Xavier was backed by the Secretary of the Mauritian Community Welfare Association of Sydney and a radio broadcaster, Mr Lamvohee, who advocated that these shows are not doing any good to the community and that some of the artists here can do a better job. The concert went ahead and it was not surprising that the turnout was meagre. However, despite the low attendance the artist made a better performance than last year. It was obvious that a lesson seems to have been learnt there.
Unfortunately, some in the same Mauritian community attacked vehemently Mr Xavier, and Mr Lamvohee, to the extent of personal attacks and libel. Their attacks were based on the grounds that both Mr Xavier and Mr Lamvohee are downgrading Mauritian artists and the Mauritian sega.
On Emission Kontak, Mr Xavier brushed aside these accusations as false and malicious, that it was clear that some have not understood, or deliberately deformed and misconstrued the facts, preferring to attack the messenger rather than the message.
The debate was amplified by a member of the community from Melbourne who went as far as accusing the Mauritians of Sydney of not being true blue Mauritians and lowering their self-esteem. All this because they did not attend the sega show in Sydney (!!!) while there was 500 or more Mauritians attending the concert n Melbourne. It was a clear strategy of reigniting the old rivalry of Sydney v/s Melbourne.
The lesson to be drawn from this episode is that the Mauritians of Sydney look more opened and have not closed themselves in their Mauritian cultural ghetto. It is true and clear that Mauritians of Sydney do not flock together as much as those of Melbourne.
Sydney is a bigger metropolis and a more sophisticated city. Such a situation seems to have taken its toll on the Sydney inhabitants in general, not only on Mauritians. In Sydney there are more things happening, there is a wider choice of leisure and entertainment. It is therefore normal for people to be exposed to a different lifestyle and influenced by the prevailing atmosphere.
This episode also denotes that Mauritians of Melbourne are more linked with their motherland and more embedded in their culture to the extent of always being together at sports and cultural events. While it is not a bad thing it itself, whereas those of Sydney are more likely to think and decide where to go and have a good time.
GDL.
Monday, 12 November 2012
Obama winner or loser ?
A win for Obama or a lost for Romney ? by gdl.
While 50.2 percent of Americans rejoicing of the reelection of Barak Obama, there are still 49.8 percent of Americans who think that Obama' first term as President of the USA was a failure.
Those who disapproved Obama's social, economic domestic policies, as well as his military and foreign policies, are said to be more on the conservative side, or coming from the conservative states.
These so called conservatives, accepted the Mitt Romney's policies no matter how controversial they are seen by the other side. Romney's voters are categorised to be from the right ( traditional Republicans) and from the far right( followers of the Tea Party). They reject social policies like the rights of marriage to gays and lesbians, are anti-abortionists and more inward looking. They opine that America should lead the world (unipolar) and confrontation with the Arab world (an open war with Iran for example) and accusing China of currency manipulation are good policies!!!
Obama's first term has not been overwhelmingly good. America has a deficit of $16 trillion dollars and an unemployment rate is nearly eight percent. There is a looming "fiscal cliff" of $600 billion to face on the 1 January of 2013. However, Obama ended the war in Iraq, withdrawing the troops from Afghanistan and killed Osama Bin Laden, are the positive highlights of his first term. He has also managed quite well the Global Financial Crisis and there are ominous signs that the America's economy is recovering, although still very ailing.
The results from these elections show that the USA is divided into 2 blocks. On one side the progressists, and on the other the conservatives. The victory at the electoral colleges,( state based) means nothing besides the popular vote. The popular vote is the real reflection of the Americans' mood in terms of real democracy.
Obama knows that he has 49.8 percent of Americans watching, and expecting him to fall and fail. But, as he will not be standing for elections again, he has nothing to lose in opening up and compromise with the Senate and House of reps to overcome the "fiscal cliff" on one side, and bring down the deficit to a reasonable level on the other. These are the real challenges for Obama and his team. The "reasonable" budget deficit acceptable by the IMF is normally three percent of GDP while America's deficit is nor more than 50 percent of its GDP, actaully 84 percent !!!! .
Surely, this is a mammoth job for the Democrats, let alone unachievable by the Obama's administration in the next forr years. It is virtually impossible for them to even balance the budget in the next for years. Again the legacy of Barak Obama, when he will definitely leave office, will not be bright in this field and will leave Hillary Clinton, (who is poised to be the next Democrate candidate to the Presidency ) to " please explain ".
But so what the USA have always lived the deficit anyway...
While 50.2 percent of Americans rejoicing of the reelection of Barak Obama, there are still 49.8 percent of Americans who think that Obama' first term as President of the USA was a failure.
Those who disapproved Obama's social, economic domestic policies, as well as his military and foreign policies, are said to be more on the conservative side, or coming from the conservative states.
These so called conservatives, accepted the Mitt Romney's policies no matter how controversial they are seen by the other side. Romney's voters are categorised to be from the right ( traditional Republicans) and from the far right( followers of the Tea Party). They reject social policies like the rights of marriage to gays and lesbians, are anti-abortionists and more inward looking. They opine that America should lead the world (unipolar) and confrontation with the Arab world (an open war with Iran for example) and accusing China of currency manipulation are good policies!!!
Obama's first term has not been overwhelmingly good. America has a deficit of $16 trillion dollars and an unemployment rate is nearly eight percent. There is a looming "fiscal cliff" of $600 billion to face on the 1 January of 2013. However, Obama ended the war in Iraq, withdrawing the troops from Afghanistan and killed Osama Bin Laden, are the positive highlights of his first term. He has also managed quite well the Global Financial Crisis and there are ominous signs that the America's economy is recovering, although still very ailing.
The results from these elections show that the USA is divided into 2 blocks. On one side the progressists, and on the other the conservatives. The victory at the electoral colleges,( state based) means nothing besides the popular vote. The popular vote is the real reflection of the Americans' mood in terms of real democracy.
Obama knows that he has 49.8 percent of Americans watching, and expecting him to fall and fail. But, as he will not be standing for elections again, he has nothing to lose in opening up and compromise with the Senate and House of reps to overcome the "fiscal cliff" on one side, and bring down the deficit to a reasonable level on the other. These are the real challenges for Obama and his team. The "reasonable" budget deficit acceptable by the IMF is normally three percent of GDP while America's deficit is nor more than 50 percent of its GDP, actaully 84 percent !!!! .
Surely, this is a mammoth job for the Democrats, let alone unachievable by the Obama's administration in the next forr years. It is virtually impossible for them to even balance the budget in the next for years. Again the legacy of Barak Obama, when he will definitely leave office, will not be bright in this field and will leave Hillary Clinton, (who is poised to be the next Democrate candidate to the Presidency ) to " please explain ".
But so what the USA have always lived the deficit anyway...
Tuesday, 23 October 2012
Revisiting Bali ten years later
Ten years ago there was a bomb at the Sari Club which killed 220 westerners. While the Sari Club has disappeared and in its place now just a car park, next to it is the memorial that will always remind visitors of the atrocity which happened there in 2002. The memorial has become to some extent, a tourist attraction as everyone who goes to
While the memory of the bombing will stand there forever, the memory of the killings seems to have disappeared in view of the strong coming back to
Bali
However the island is fast becoming overcrowded with 3 millions inhabitants of whom 95 percent are of the Hindu faith, three percent Christians and two percent Muslims. Religion is not in the forefront as Balinese, except for the few Islamists fanatics, understand secularism. Not a single women in
The construction of a new international airport on Lombok is poised to alleviate
The competitions to Bali, however, are coming from the
Back to
If the fear of another bombing, as pointed out above, seems to have somehow disappeared, this is like discarding the reality or playing the ostrich. The possibility of another bombing in Bali still exists as long as there are elements of Jamma Islamia on
However, the possibility of any bomb on the Gillis is very very remote and they should and will remain the little paradises, not lost, of the
Sunday, 16 September 2012
Al Qaida presence in Australlia by GDL
"AL-QA'IDA sympathisers were among those involved in violent weekend protests in Sydney, which saw Muslim men engage in a series of running battles with officers from both the NSW and Australian Federal Police.Several of the hundreds of demonstrators who marched on the city's US consulate were carrying the black flags adopted by the proscribed terror organisation and its splinter groups, including the Islamic State of Iraq."(The Australian newspaper).
The protesters, these Islamists fundamentalists extremists who have no moral values, used women and children during their uncivilised and unlawful protest to show how hatred was at the centre of their message. Some photos show children holding signs saying: "Behead those that insult the prophet." This demonstrates how low some can go with such a savage and bellingerent mentality.
"Some of this will have to be looked at from a legal perspective to see what offences are actually committed by some of these text messages," Deputy Commissioner Nick Kaldastold the Seven Network on Monday. (The daily Telegraph)
It is the wish of all law abiding citizens of Australia that these rascals be dealt with severely to serve as a lesson to others with the same mindset. From what we saw in TV on Saturday, it is obvious that some people cannot adapt to the western democracy style and philosophy.
What we saw can only be qualified as barbaric behaviours which is the modus operandi of these extremists. It is needless to educate them, a waste of time; if they have not changed they will never change.They deserve other treatments tailored for their needs.
Australia has for too long been too tolerant to extremism in the name of political correctness. The Labour government with its involvemnt in Afghanitan, its lack of a coherent migration policy and its failure on border protection, is encouraging criminals and other extremists to enter the country without proper check and balances of their backgrounds. No surprise that some of them come without any identification. They purposely destroyed these.
The unlawful protest by these extremists was disgusting and enraging to say the least. Australia should have tougher laws to deal with these extremists.They should be expelled from the country as they do not understand what democracy stands for and what are Australian values.
Go back to where you come from....you are the parias of our society.
WE DO NOT WANT YOU HERE.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)